|
I keep reading again and again that nature and the presence or absence of what we can recognize as intelligent design stands of prove or as refutation to the religious believes.
This is not really the whole case, sure we assume that if the world was created it would stand an intelligent design but science hasn't reached all the levels of revelation that can be reached.
The claim for example of many channelers is that there are more than three D in human and other DNA, is science able to measure what is real or is it capable of slowly evolving the tools needed to see the truth as it is.
Different Paradigms evolved under different measuring tools and the refinement of the observation tools might lead us to new discoveries about the nature of reality. There are certain types of realities that can be observed as for today only from the inside.
I believe that science is evolving and will reach the point of confirming many believes that are yet to be confirmed as what can be seen from the inside would integrate with what can be seen from the outside.
Sure every time science discovers something about the way species evolve the discussion is opened again but there is no contradiction between the realization that certain mechanism in animals and humans are not optimally suitable for their needs and the acknowledgment of a creator, because we and all other being use the freedom of choice and adaptation to our way of life even if we were "intended" to live in this or that living condition,
|
